Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are modern humans classed as “gracile” or “robust”?

0
Posted

Are modern humans classed as “gracile” or “robust”?

0

Several people seem to have confused “robust” with “robustus” (i.e. Paranthropus robustus). This is not what the question is referring to. When referring to skeletal anatomy, the word “robust” tends to be used to refer to characteristics like relative thickness of bones, deepness of muscle markings (can also be described as “rugosity”) and overall size of the skeleton. So, for example, it can be said that relative to modern humans, Neanderthals were a very robust species. In answer to the question, you could say that relative to other hominid species preceeding Homo sapiens, we are indeed “gracile”. However it’s important to remember that there’s a lot of variation within our species and as such there exist individuals whose skeletons may be considered “robust” when considered next to an “average” skeleton from a modern human.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123