Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are House Democrats serious about national security?

0
Posted

Are House Democrats serious about national security?

0

by Matthew Continetti, The Weekly Standard Washington, Feb 25, 2008 – On February 16, last year’s bipartisan legislation governing the collection of foreign intelligence and protecting from liability all persons who comply with federal directives to assist in such collection–the law otherwise known as the “Protect America Act of 2007”–expired, having exhausted its six-month, 15-day statutory lifespan. At which time the federal government’s ability to pursue suspected terrorists and emerging threats was dealt a serious blow. You can thank House Democrats for the whole sorry mess. The Democratic leadership denies this, of course, having adopted an Alfred E. Neuman “What, Me Worry?” approach to national security. The lack of a new statute “does not, in reality, threaten the safety of Americans,” protests Senate majority leader Harry Reid. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 still applies. Says Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois, “The FISA law–even if we do not change it–

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123