Are Fabricated Hockey Sticks From Discredited Tree-Ring Science The Natural Result of Flawed Peer Review System?
Read here, here, here, here, and here. Over the last week, AGW climate science has again been rocked by bogus data and dubious scientific techniques that have raised serious questions of fraud or huge incompetence. The paleo-climate studies in question were all peer-reviewed, which raises serious questions about the entire peer-review process. The collection of links above indicate a serious peer-review problem that exists at the majority of publications that publish climate science studies. Based on the fraudulent studies over the last decade, it would be reasonable to conclude that one can’t put too much faith in AGW-oriented studies that have been “peer-reviewed.
