Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are emotion and reason equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

0
Posted

Are emotion and reason equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

0

Consent is the basis of moral and ethical decisions affecting people and relationships. We cannot know everything, but if we listen to one another, we can check and balance our decisions, mediate, and agree upon the best solutions based on all available input, information and considerations. So long as we take into account any objections from ourselves or others and resolve those, decisions made by consensus satisfy both emotion and logic without contradicting one or the other. This is the ideal. So both reason and emotion are necessary for this process. Reason or logic helps us to sort out what is contradictory and what would satisfy all conditions to maximize the good, minimize the suffering or sacrifice, and verify where the parties affected agree is equally fair to all concerned. However, emotions can guide us into the past or future, to ideas beyond our conscious knowledge, that we may not otherwise consider in the equation. Intuition plays a far greater role in decisions than our

0

No, emotion is a distraction that usually proves counterproductive when justifying a moral decision. It tends to cause bias, which could cause a decision to be made incorrectly by favoring the less appropriate.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123