Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are Dems Protecting FAA Patronage Plum?

DEMs FAA patronage Plum Protecting
0
Posted

Are Dems Protecting FAA Patronage Plum?

0

President Bush may have nominated FAA Deputy Administrator Robert Sturgell to head the aviation agency, but his man may never take the post. The nomination as FAA chief requires confirmation by the U.S. Senate, and that body has repeatedly put off hearings toward approving Sturgell for the job. A number of reasons have been rumored. Among them is that labor-friendly Democrats in the Senate are miffed at the agency stiffing the air traffic controllers’ union in contract negotiations, and Sturgell is paying the price for that. One insider in Washington’s aviation community points to a more base school of thought: Democrats are confident they can wrest control of the White House from Republicans come the national election in November. Therefore, they are protecting every plum of political patronage that they can. The FAA administrator’s post is a choice one, this thinking holds, so Senate Democrats are likely to put off Sturgell’s nomination until it can be withdrawn and replaced by one o

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.