Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are CFC-replacements really ozone friendly?

friendly ozone
0
Posted

Are CFC-replacements really ozone friendly?

0

The chemicals that are currently replacing CFCs are either HCFCs (hydrochlorofluorocarbons) or HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons such as R-134a). HCFCs have less chlorine in them and are less susceptible to the reactions that release chlorine in the stratosphere. But they are still ozone-depleting chemicals — they just destroy far less ozone than CFCs. For example, while CFC-12 has an ozone depleting potential rating of 1.0, HCFCs have ratings from 0.02 – 0.1. HCFCs will eventually be phased out by 2030, as stated in the Montreal Protocol. HFCs do not contain chlorine, so they don’t contribute to ozone destruction at all. However, since both of these groups are potent heat-trapping gases, they are a stop-gap measure, the lesser of two evils. Eventually, we are going to need a permanent replacement for all these kinds of chemicals.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123