Are Bigfoot Facts Based Upon Reality, Imagination, Or Hoax?
Many of the Bigfoot facts presented to date have turned out to be the result of sometimes elaborate hoaxes. Others are based upon vivid imaginations. When something looms up if front of us all of a sudden, it often appears to be much larger than it actually is. Other Bigfoot facts appear to be based upon credible observations, which is not to say they prove Bigfoot to be real, but at least give the possibility that Bigfoot exists a certain amount of credence. Any good scientist will be somewhat of a skeptic, rather than running with whatever evidence happens to be in someway supportive of one theory or another. In this case, the theory is that Bigfoot exists, and there are no findings to date, and perhaps never will be, that the opposite is true. Not being able to prove that Bigfoot does not exist does not mean the creature does exist. Proving that something “isn’t” is often more difficult than proving it “is”. There are those who believe Bigfoot exists and seek out data, information,
Many of the Bigfoot facts presented to date have turned out to be the result of sometimes elaborate hoaxes. Others are based upon vivid imaginations. When something looms up if front of us all of a sudden, it often appears to be much larger than it actually is. Other Bigfoot facts appear to be based upon credible observations, which is not to say they prove Bigfoot to be real, but at least give the possibility that Bigfoot exists a certain amount of credence. Any good scientist will be somewhat of a skeptic, rather than running with whatever evidence happens to be in someway supportive of one theory or another. In this case, the theory is that Bigfoot exists, and there are no findings to date, and perhaps never will be, that the opposite is true. Not being able to prove that Bigfoot does not exist does not mean the creature does exist. Proving that something “isn’t” is often more difficult than proving it “is”.
