Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

APRA already charge radio stations a licence fee to broadcast music. Why is another fee payable?

0
Posted

APRA already charge radio stations a licence fee to broadcast music. Why is another fee payable?

0

Composers have a number of separate rights under the Copyright Act to enable them to make a fair financial return on their work. They have the right to authorise the broadcast of their music – hence the APRA|AMCOS licence for radio stations to broadcast copyright material – and, quite separately, the right to control the public performance and communication of their work by radio, TV or any other means. Businesses playing copyright music by radio or TV are giving a public performance and those who use music on hold are authorising a communication to the public. Both uses of music require an APRA|AMCOS licence.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123