Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Apical Sublaminar Wires versus Pedicle Screws – Which Provides Better Results for Surgical Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

0
Posted

Apical Sublaminar Wires versus Pedicle Screws – Which Provides Better Results for Surgical Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

0

• a, d, e – Medtronic Sofamor Danek Introduction: Despite the reports of satisfactory correction of scoliotic curves by both apical sublaminar wire instrumentation and apical pedicle screw instrumentation, no reports on the comprehensive comparison of hybrid (hook/sublaminar wire/pedicle screw) instrumentation versus segmental pedicle screw instrumentation exist. Objective: To comprehensively compare the 2-year minimum postoperative results of posterior correction and spinal fusion (PSF) using translational correction through either hybrid hook/apical sublaminar wire/pedicle screw constructs (SLW) versus in-situ rod-contouring correction with pedicle screw constructs (PS) in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) at two institutions. Materials and Methods: 50 AIS patients at two institutions who underwent a posterior spinal fusion with SLW (25) or PS (25) constructs were sorted and matched according to four criteria; similar age at surgery (14.2 years – SLW and 14.4 yea

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123