Any free trials or demo versions?
They are counter-productive with Jurik Tools. That may come as a surprise, but there is sound logic behind it. Standard technical indicators have significant lag. For years users have grown accustomed to it and tried to devise ways to mitigate its disadvantages. Because our tools have little lag, proper application requires spending time rethinking how to write technical indicators THE WAY THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALL ALONG. For example, a common first-approach toward creating a MACD with JMA is to use it for both the fast and slow crossover lines as follows: MyMACD=fast JMA – slow JMA However, the result is mediocre. This is because MACD actually *requires* lag, but only *between* the two crossing lines. Therefore, for best results, it’s better that the slower line have both lag and momentum so that it does not weaken when price reverses. Otherwise, the crossover is delayed as the faster line tries to meet the slower one (which is turning away). A simple moving average (SMA) has more lag
They are counter-productive with Jurik Tools. That may come as a surprise, but there is sound logic behind it. Standard technical indicators have significant lag. For years users have grown accustomed to it and tried to devise ways to mitigate its disadvantages. Because our tools have little lag, proper application requires spending time rethinking how to write technical indicators THE WAY THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALL ALONG. For example, a common first-approach toward creating a MACD with JMA is to use it for both the fast and slow crossover lines as follows: MyMACD=fast JMA – slow JMA However, the result is mediocre. This is because MACD actually *requires* lag, but only *between* the two crossing lines. Therefore, for best results, it’s better that the slower line have both lag and momentum so that it does not weaken when price reverses. Otherwise, the crossover is delayed as the faster line tries to meet the slower one (which is turning away). A simple moving average (SMA) has more lag
