Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Another registration service is publishing literature stating that a “pet” is an inferior dog. What gives?

0
Posted

Another registration service is publishing literature stating that a “pet” is an inferior dog. What gives?

0

That, frankly, is a direct attempt to disparage America’s PET Registry, Inc. As the alternative choice of the vast majority of pet owners and professional pet breeders, APRI is gaining wide recognition. Degrading “pet” is merely an unsuccessful attempt to attack the credibility of APRI. APRI can’t be honestly attacked on our service, our integrity, or our economical fees, and that leaves nothing else with which to discredit us. Thus, by attacking our name, the attempt is to persuade others that APRI registers only inferior dogs! Innumerable pet owners and superior breeders know otherwise. That other service states that dogs should be classified as “Show,” “Standard,” and “Pet,” with “pet” being substandard and of poor quality. Does that mean no one should say “I have a pet” unless it is faulty or sick? Or that each person should state, “I own a show dog,” or “I own a standard dog,” or “I own a pet dog?” Hardly. Millions of “pets” are also show dogs or of show quality. That campaign app

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123