Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Ancient American Inscriptions: Plow Marks or History?

0
Posted

Ancient American Inscriptions: Plow Marks or History?

0

, Long Hill, Mass.: Early Sites Research Society, 1993, as cited by Sorenson, 1993, p. 21.

0

(Long Hill, Mass.: Early Sites Research Society, 1993, as cited by Sorenson, 1993, p. 21) and Jacques de Mahieu, “Corpus des inscriptions ruiniques d’Amerique du Sud,” Kadath 68, Brussels, 1988, pp. 11-42 (cited by Sorenson, 1993, p. 21). More relevant research has tentatively identified hundreds of possible links between Uto-Aztecan languages (in Book of Mormon territory) with the ancient Hebrew language (work by Brian D.

0

(McGlone, et al. 1993). The strongest professional support for American examples has come from archaeologist and epigrapher David Kelley (1990), who is known for important contributions toward decipherment of Mayan. One Hundred Fifty Years of Rejection Two quotations from Fowke (1901) illuminate the origins of skepticism about engraved stones.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123