am # Government interference in the free market having unintended consequences?
Say it ain’t so! Also, you’re all looking at this from the wrong perspective. Think of the children! Comment by McGehee on 9/12 @ 5:04 am # Think of the children! Great, now I’ll be thinking of kitchen appliances. Could use a new blender… Comment by Major John on 9/12 @ 5:38 am # McGehee – blenders are for puppies. Just ask Professor Reynolds… Comment by Dan Collins on 9/12 @ 5:57 am # And sometimes for tricky rabbits. Comment by Chris on 9/12 @ 6:36 am # We bought one of those efficient front-loader washers (second-hand). It is less convenient than a top-loader because you’ve got to get down on your knees to load/unload, and if you forget to toss in one sweaty sock before you start it, you’ve got to wash the sock by hand or wait until the next load. Don’t want to open the front door on the washer once it’s got water in it. The washer started to stink and broke within a year. The repairman said the front-loaders often stink because the design doesn’t allow it to pump all the water out.
Related Questions
- If wind energy is competitive, why does it need a tax credit subsidy from the government? Isn this government interference in the free market?
- What deleterious consequences does the free market have? And in what ways should the market be limited?
- am # Government interference in the free market having unintended consequences?