Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

According to conventional historians, was the uranium bomb tested before supposedly being dropped over Hiroshima?

0
Posted

According to conventional historians, was the uranium bomb tested before supposedly being dropped over Hiroshima?

0

No. There was no testing whatsoever of a uranium bomb in Alamogordo or anywhere else before Hiroshima. • 8. Isn’t that strange? Yes. Typical weapons are tested for months and years before deployment; there is no other weapon that according to the accepted “facts” deployed before any testing whatsoever. • 9. How many witnesses are there for all of the atomic tests allegedly occuring during the fifties and sixties? Very few, perhaps a few hundred, who claimed to have seen them. • 10. What did the General Advisory Committee of the Atomic Energy Commission say in their report of October 30, 1949? They recommended strongly against the development of what they called the “Super Bomb,” which is simply a thermonuclear bomb. They said that “A super bomb might become a weapon of genocide.” • 11. Isn’t this four years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Yes. Obviously development of nuclear weapons occurred well after their supposed implementation in 1945. • 12. Is radioactivity dangerous? Everything i

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123