Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Aborigines have local knowledge but databases are universal. How is local knowledge used in a database?

0
10 Posted

Aborigines have local knowledge but databases are universal. How is local knowledge used in a database?

0
10

The notion of databases as somehow universal knowledge assumes two things. First it takes for granted the existence of ‘facts’ little pieces of knowledge referring to a single ‘out-there’ reality. And second it assumes that if you could only get enough of them together in one place facts would eventually link up into one complete system of knowledge. In many traditions of Indigenous knowledge (and in many sciences) both assumptions are seen as both wrong and ludicrous. Anyone who thinks about the notion of universality for very long will see that ‘facts’ are always generated and ‘made solid’ in specific places and times by particular groups of people. It is always done in specific ways. It is commonplace that it is actually very difficult to get things to link up. It is sometimes very difficult to actually link working databases, for example those that have been assembled in doing biodiversity. Data is just as diverse as biological organisms are. We found this when we started searching

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123