Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Aren’t the RDAs sufficient?

rdas sufficient
0
Posted

Aren’t the RDAs sufficient?

0

No. There is a large body of evidence showing that many vitamins and minerals – when consumed at higher than Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) levels – are beneficial in maintaining optimum health and preventing the development of chronic diseases. The RDAs only indicate the amounts of vitamins and minerals needed to prevent common nutrient deficiency diseases (such as rickets or scurvy) in the average person. They do not take into consideration a person’s individual metabolic needs, determined at the genetic level. Neither do they take into account a person’s dietary habits, lifestyle, health status or numerous other factors. Similarly, the RDAs also ignore the fact that nutrients operate in teams in our bodies, as opposed to as individual chemical substances in the way that pharmaceutical drugs do.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123