Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why not welfare instead of rights?

Rights welfare
0
Posted

Why not welfare instead of rights?

0

Because welfare will always allow for animals to be used as a means to an end it can never be adequate for sentient beings. Welfare states that animals can be used so long as pain is minimized. A rights position, on the other hand, says that sentient beings have a right to be free from unnecessary pain and suffering. Sentient life is more than a commodity and welfare try as it might, can never overcome this. Regardless of how well animals are treated, when they are needlessly killed because of anothers desire they become a tool.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.