What Sank SeaQuest?
was a very believable environment, and one that was even relevant to the time of production. The events took place within the 2010’s, only 20 years from the present times. The realism used made the show fun and educational. I believe in this sense that the show was ahead of its time. These days, sci-fi has to be as explainable, and even as real, as possible. seaQuest had that in the early 90’s. But this leaves us with a bit of a problem. It’s not true sci-fi, but it masquerades as such. I love the realistic feel, but am I watching a Trek-wannabe or Hunt for Red October? I think this was part of the problem. It was a good concept, but it was a concept the public wasn’t quite ready for. Now, many criticized the characters. Honestly, any new show will face this at some point. We need to give the characters time to flesh themselves out. It doesn’t happen overnight, not if you want a really well-developed character. That may have been the problem here. Some characters demonstrate a good dea
Related Questions
- Im really curious about one thing. If the ship carrying the Hand of Ra sank in 300 feet of water, how did it end up in the United States in a private collection?
- IF LUKE SKYWALKER HADNT BLOWN UP THE DEATH STAR, WOULD THE SEAQUEST STILL BE COMMANDED BY RICHARD BASEHART AND DAVID "AL" HEDISON?
- Who Sank the Bismarck?
