Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

on an audio CD?

0
Posted

on an audio CD?

0

The challenge here is to create a disc that will play on a standard audio CD player but be difficult to copy or “rip” into an MP3. The techniques making headlines in mid-2001 were developed by Macrovision (2-4-3) and SunnComm (2-4-4). The earliest form of audio CD copy protection was SCMS. This only works on recorders that support SCMS, specifically consumer-grade stand-alone audio CD recorders. “Professional” recorders, and recorders that attach to computers, do not support SCMS. See section (2-25). Some CDs used a damaged TOC (Table of Contents — see section (2-27)) that confused some CD-ROM drives and ripping software. More recent schemes attempt to modify the audio samples in ways that confuse CD-ROM drives into playing static. The next few sections describe these approaches in detail. For a list of suspected copy-protected discs, and some tips on what you can do to let the industry know that the protection isn’t appreciated, see http://www.fatchucks.com/corruptcds/. Many forms of

0

The challenge here is to create a disc that will play on a standard audio CD player but be difficult to copy or “rip” into an MP3. The techniques making headlines in mid-2001 were developed by Macrovision (2-4-3) and SunnComm (2-4-4). The earliest form of audio CD copy protection was SCMS. This only works on recorders that support SCMS, specifically consumer-grade stand-alone audio CD recorders. “Professional” recorders, and recorders that attach to computers, do not support SCMS. See section (2-25). Some CDs used a damaged TOC (Table of Contents — see section (2-27)) that confused some CD-ROM drives and ripping software. More recent schemes attempt to modify the audio samples in ways that confuse CD-ROM drives into playing static. The next few sections describe these approaches in detail. For a list of suspected copy-protected discs, and some tips on what you can do to let the industry know that the protection isn’t appreciated, see http://www.fatchucks.com/corruptcds/.

0

The challenge here is to create a disc that will play on a standard audio CD player but be difficult to copy or “rip” into an MP3. The techniques making headlines in mid-2001 were developed by Macrovision (2-4-3) and SunnComm (2-4-4). The earliest form of audio CD copy protection was SCMS. This only works on recorders that support SCMS, specifically consumer-grade stand-alone audio CD recorders. “Professional” recorders, and recorders that attach to computers, do not support SCMS. See section (2-25). Some CDs used a damaged TOC (Table of Contents — see section (2-27)) that confused some CD-ROM drives and ripping software. More recent schemes attempt to modify the audio samples in ways that confuse CD-ROM drives into playing static. The next few sections describe these approaches in detail. A web site at www.fatchucks.com used to have a list of suspected copy-protected discs and some tips on what you can do to let the industry know that copy protection isn’t appreciated. The web site a

0

(2002/10/21) The challenge here is to create a disc that will play on a standard audio CD player but be difficult to copy or “rip” into an MP3. The techniques making headlines in mid-2001 were developed by Macrovision (2-4-3) and SunnComm (2-4-4). The earliest form of audio CD copy protection was SCMS. This only works on recorders that support SCMS, specifically consumer-grade stand-alone audio CD recorders. “Professional” recorders, and recorders that attach to computers, do not support SCMS. See section (2-25). Some CDs used a damaged TOC (Table of Contents — see section (2-27)) that confused some CD-ROM drives and ripping software. More recent schemes attempt to modify the audio samples in ways that confuse CD-ROM drives into playing static. The next few sections describe these approaches in detail. A web site at www.fatchucks.com used to have a list of suspected copy-protected discs and some tips on what you can do to let the industry know that copy protection isn’t appreciated. T

0
0

[2-4-3] …on an audio CD (Macrovision – SafeAudio) [2-4-4] …on an audio CD (SunnComm – MediaCloQ and MediaMax CD3) [2-4-5] …on an audio CD (Midbar Tech – Cactus Data Shield) [2-4-6] …on an audio CD (Key2Audio / Sony DADC) [2-4-7] …on an audio CD (BayView Systems – Duolizer) [2-4-8] …on an audio CD (Sanyo)

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.