Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How can readers distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices?

0
Posted

How can readers distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices?

0

The role of using rhetoric is a form of using persuasive devices such as wording to achieve a goal in persuading and influencing the reader into a fallacy or belief that the author has on a subject or topic. A different way if describing is a person’s own “Spin” or “Belief” is not neutral and is bias and downplays the opposing view then it is described as rhetoric. Some of the devices or tools as described by reading, Moore and Parker (Critical Thinking, 2004) chapters 4 thru 6 are: ■ Euphemisms and Dysphemisms ■ Rhetorical Comparisons, Definitions, and Explanations ■ Stereotypes ■ Innuendo ■ Loaded Questions ■ Weaselers ■ Downplayers ■ Horse Laugh/ Ridicule/Sarcasm ■ Hyperbole ■ Proof Surrogates One of the ways of distinguishing between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices is education and acquiring the skills that can identify what is rhetorical. Non-prejudicial rhetorical device can be described as slanting using “euphemisms”. This only means putting a positive

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.