Can an HSRB decision be appealed?
If an expedited reviewer of an HSRB makes a decision that the investigator believes to be unduly restrictive on the proposed research, the investigator may appeal, in writing, for review by the convened HSRB. If the convened HSRB makes a decision that the investigator believes to be unduly restrictive on the proposed research, the investigator should first discuss the matter with the Chair of the HSRB or the Director of the Office of Research Subject Protections, taking care to explain the reasons for believing that the proposed procedures are in compliance with University policy and with Federal regulations. If the issue cannot be resolved satisfactorily by negotiation, the investigator may appeal the decision of the HSRB, in writing. The HSRB will reconsider the appeal based upon the new information provided and will continue to re-review protocols as long as the investigator wishes to appeal.
