Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is it reasonable to select people for redundancy on a LIFO (last-in-first-out) basis?

0
Posted

Is it reasonable to select people for redundancy on a LIFO (last-in-first-out) basis?

0

Probably, providing you are consistent. You risk trouble if you make some of your most recent recruits redundant, but hang on to others — unless you have additional criteria (also discussed in the consultation process) that justify the difference in treatment. For example, you might decide to make people redundant on a last-in-first-out basis, unless they have successfully completed a training programme. However, if the application of LIFO disproportionately affects a particular sector of your workforce, they may have a claim for unlawful discrimination on the ground of gender, age, race, sexual orientation, religious or philosophical belief, or disability — unless you can show that the application of LIFO is objectively justified. If, for instance, you habitually take on a tranche of 18-year olds, and find your redundancies from amongst them later in the year, you could well fall foul of the age discrimination legislation.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.