What alternative therapies exist?
• What is the current scientific knowledge regarding the effectiveness of FFP? • What directions for future research are indicated? Panel’s Conclusions The administration of FFP has increased dramatically in recent years despite the paucity of definitive indications for its use. This increase has occurred in the presence of mounting evidence of its potential risks, which include viral hepatitis and possibly AIDS. Many patients who receive FFP can be managed more effectively and safely with alternative modalities. Appropriate use of FFP must be justified on clinical grounds until better evidence is available. Research to develop safer FFP and alternative therapies is encouraged. There is no justification for the use of FFP as a volume expander or as a nutritional source. Safer alternative therapies exists. FFP is indicated for some documented coagulation protein deficiencies as well as for selected patients who require massive transfusions. It is indicated for patients with multiple coa
