Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

line boring reasons?

boring line reasons
0
Posted

line boring reasons?

0

The diameter of the mains, measure in the center in the oil groove and thus the least worn part of the journal, are: #2 1.606 #3 1.598 #4 1.591 #5 1.597 #6 1.604 Since I have no specs on the original diameters we don’t know when to stop grinding and start welding. He thinks it will take .030″ to clean it up. The rod journals appear to have been ground once as I have seen a trade article that says the original diameter was 1.625″ and most of them read 1.613″. The worst was #6 at 1.605 and, at 90 degrees from the first measurement, 1.600″. He is of the school that says babbitt should be as thin as possible and so is concerned about the thickness of the babbitt insert bearings, now at .135″ and how thick they can be before a brass backing should be made and babbitt laid into it. I wouldn’t think .015″ more would matter.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.