Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

If I have 30-plus sites already equipped with digital receivers, but they were made by Compression Labs Inc. and not DigiCipher, is there any potential for cross-over?

0
Posted

If I have 30-plus sites already equipped with digital receivers, but they were made by Compression Labs Inc. and not DigiCipher, is there any potential for cross-over?

0

A — It will depend on the CLI standard which is in use. A lot of the CLI equipment in the field is the old CLI standard which approximates MPEGI. It is unlikely that sufficient demand could be generated for any MPEG I standard to justify engineering a digital channel with about 3.0 MHz of bandwidth to carry MPEG I signals. The new CLI – MPEG II standard has been purchased by General Instruments and is marketed under the Magnitude trademark. As long as all of the encoding/decoding (CODEC) standards which are placed on the same digital channel are completely interoperable and as long as there is sufficient demand, there should not be a problem for a portion of an ADEC transponder (ie one channel) to be dedicated to MPEG II/DVB) transport. “Digital video information which is encoded in a particular standard can not be decoded with equipment employing a different standard. For example, CLI IRDs would not be able to decode a digital signal which was encoded in the DigiCipher standard. (Ind

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123