Is sentinel lymph node biopsy more accurate than axillary dissection for staging nodal involvement in breast cancer patients?
Today evaluation of axillary involvement can be routinely performed with the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). One of the greatest advantages of SLNB is the nearly total absence of local postoperative complications. It is important to understand whether SLNB is better than axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) for staging axillary nodal involvement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the axillary staging accuracy comparing three different methods: axillary dissection, sentinel node biopsy with the traditional 4-6 sections and sentinel node biopsy with complete analysis of the lymph node. 527 consecutive patients (525 females and 2 males) with invasive breast cancer < or = 3 cm and clinically negative axillary nodes were divided into 3 different groups: group A treated with axillary dissection, group B treated with sentinel nodal biopsy analysed with 4-6 sections, and group C treated with sentinel node biopsy with analysis of the entire node. All patients underwent a qua
Related Questions
- Is sentinel lymph node biopsy more accurate than axillary dissection for staging nodal involvement in breast cancer patients?
- Is positron emission tomography an accurate non-invasive alternative to sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients?
- Can axillary dissection be avoided in patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis?
