Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why a sequel to Mary Shelleys Frankenstein?

0
Posted

Why a sequel to Mary Shelleys Frankenstein?

0

WL: Well, it’s not really a sequel. It’s not like it picks up where Frankenstein left off or anything like that. The Monster in Mary’s Monster isn’t exactly the same monster we know. Mary Shelley kind of filtered a real story into her book. This is a novel about the product of the real story. Q: But this is a story that everybody knows. WL: Maybe, maybe not. The challenge I felt when I first started this book way back when was that even though I always loved Boris Karloff and the neck bolts and all that stuff, as an adult, the Frankenstein Monster isn’t really scary. The whole appeal when I watch Bride of Frankenstein now is kind of sentimental. It’s like I’m reliving something I experienced as a kid. I wanted to tell a story in the present, with this real person who just happened to be created two hundred years ago in a laboratory. Spending two hundred years as an outcast, that’s got to have an effect on you. I read the original book as a teenager, and I will admit it took me a couple

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.