Whats new with WebHogs?
Feb. 5, 2003: Filters added to remove some false positives. With this type of program, generally one avoids filters which may remove from reports true positives. Your ideas for more filters are welcome. Jan. 26, 2003: A RAM leak fixed. This would be beneficial to very long runs of Webhogs. July 14, 2002: More bugs fixed. Since July 10, more strings have been added to the tag searches (see below). Also, “?” within html tags is scaled by content length as the “onmouse” references have been. This will reduce the impact of the “?” count on the Pig Score. Thus, Pig Scores calculated before July 10 may be “inflated” by the excessive use of “?” references (which suggest info might be sent to the web server). As time goes on, the weighting of components in the Pig Score might be further polished. There was some interest in seeing the cookies delivered by web servers in the http header. These are now displayed if Other is checked. Q: Is a high Pig Score bad? A: Not necessarily. The concept was
