Does rit meet RTS specification completely?
Almost. But not quite. rit doesn’t meet RTS specification completely. The difference is perhaps immaterial to most users. Recall that RTS has some special characters ( #, @, %, &, ~, _, ‘, ^) which have special meaning. RTS also specifies how to print these special characters. If you want to print these using rit version 1.0, you may not be able to do so. Typing \&, \% prints & and % respectively. Typing @ by itself (blanks on either side) prints @. The rest of them cannot be printed, unless you are willing to edit the LaTeX file rit generates. rit version 1.0 gives more importance to using LaTeX commands freely in its input than to conforming to RTS in printing the special characters.
Related Questions
- Can I use a WaterSense labeled faucet accessory to meet the flow rate criteria contained in the specification? Does my faucet still need to be tested?
- Why do I get an error message saying that my graphic hardware does not meet the requirements though it does regarding the technical specification?
- Does rit meet RTS specification completely?