Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is the difference between a regular motion for summary judgment and a fully-briefed motion for summary judgment (summary judgment packet)?

0
Posted

What is the difference between a regular motion for summary judgment and a fully-briefed motion for summary judgment (summary judgment packet)?

0

In a regular motion for summary judgment, the moving party files its motion and supporting documents with the court by the dispositive motion deadline specified in the scheduling order. The opposing party then has thirty days to file a response, and the moving party has fifteen days to file a reply. In a fully-briefed motion for summary judgment, the moving party will serve the motion and supporting documents on the opposing party, but will not file the motion with the court at that time. The opposing party has thirty days to serve a response on the moving party. The moving party then has fifteen days to draft a reply and file the entire packet with the court. The entire packet (consisting of the motion, response, and reply) must be filed by the dispositive motion deadline specified in the scheduling order.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.